Thursday, October 20, 2011

This is not payback

Welcome to India, laddie!
Over the last two weeks, there has been an inundation of reports on how the on-going series between India and England is a payback series, for India to extract some revenge over their savage manhandling in the recent Test series in England. Given the way the series has gone so far, the tag is being gleefully justified by most of the media outlets, even the English ones.
What a load of rubbish.
Winning an ODI series at home against a 5th ranked side (4th at the start of the series) is in no way the perfect riposte to the humiliating whitewash in a Test series in the opposition’s backyard, which by the way resulted in conceding the Number 1 crown as well. Sure, the victories in the first two ODIs of this series has somewhat made Indian supporters cheerful again; but we always knew that England were generally rubbish in the 50 over version. The ODI series in England would have been tighter if it wasn’t for old friends Duckworth and Lewis, who had to poke their noses in just about every game of that series. So, defeating England in this series, even in the absence of so many regulars, is not payback enough.
The chance for a real payback comes next year when, apparently, England tour India for a Test series. England used their home advantage well to inflict heavy defeat on an under-prepared Indian side in the last series; therefore, it only makes sense that India churn out some ‘turners’ to test the adaptability of this English side. If and only if India whitewash England then, I will accept it as payback. Till then, will just have to do with tossing them around in ODIs. Sigh.
PS: This has nothing to do with the rest of this article, but had to address this -
Trott’s record in ODIs is better than Bell’s, both in terms of average and strike rate. So get over his inclusion already!
Why is everyone piling on poor Trott, bru?
Benny for DieHard Cricket Fans
Follow Benny on Twitter @tracerbullet007

Wednesday, October 19, 2011

Simon Jones comes back home: Fast bowler re-joins Glamorgan

Colin Metson (Managing Director of Cricket), Simon Jones and Matthew Mott (Head Coach) (c) Huw John Photography
Today (Wednesday 19 October), pace bowler Simon Jones has announced his return to Wales after signing a new two-year contract with his boyhood club, Glamorgan.
The 2005 Ashes winner, from Llanelli, originally left the Dragons in 2007 to join Worcestershire. He signed for Hampshire in 2010 but returned to Glamorgan on loan earlier this year taking part in the Friends Life t20 and Clydesdale Bank40 campaigns.
During the t20 campaign, Jones put his past injury woes behind him by becoming one of only three county cricketers to hit bowling speeds of 94 m.p.h. He figured in ten t20 and three CB40 matches for Glamorgan and took 13 wickets during his six-week loan spell.
Simon, 32, says: “I’m really happy to return home and play for Glamorgan. This cricket club has played an integral role in my career and my life and I’m thrilled to be back to help achieve success with the club in the next two years and to play regular cricket. After four happy years over the border, there is no price tag on being nearer to family and coming home to Wales.
“It’s been a frustrating few seasons for me with injuries, but I’ve put this behind me and I’m thrilled to be moving on with my game. Also in the back of my mind, I haven’t given up on the dream of playing for England again. I’m confident that I still have the form that got me selected in the first place and prove some critics wrong.”
Colin Metson, Glamorgan’s Managing Director of Cricket, adds: “We’re thrilled to have Simon Jones back on board with us at Glamorgan Cricket. He impressed us all both on and off the field when he returned during a brief loan spell earlier this season and we’re delighted that he is now a permanent fixture here at The SWALEC Stadium.”
Simon, fiancée Justine and sons Harvey (4) and Charlie (3) have since left the South of England and returned to live in St Nicholas, Vale of Glamorgan. Simon and Justine are due to get married in December.
Editor’s Notes
Simon Jones started his career with Glamorgan as a 16 year-old in 1998.
He is the son of former Glamorgan cricket star Jeff Jones, who also played 15 Tests for England.
He is a former pupil at Coedcae Comprehensive and Millfield School.
He made his test debut for England against India at Lord’s in July 2002

Payback Time For England: ODI Series Update

Indian fans and pundits alike were hurt by their teams’ capitulation in England this summer to the extent they named the return series that began in India last Friday as the “Payback Series”.
And if teaching England a ruddy good lesson in One Day cricket was India’s primary objective for this tour and let’s be honest, it was a little bit, then India have succeeded, with devastating effect.
India have won the first two One Day Internationals of the tour by a mile and have been better than England in every facet of the game. The likes of Dhoni, Gambhir and Kohli have scored big runs, Umesh Yadav and Vinay Kumar look dangerous with the ball, a far cry from the impotent attack that toured England this summer, and perhaps most surprisingly India’s fielding has been razor sharp – much better than their English counterparts.
But for as good as India have been, and they have been very good, England have been poor and have gifted India these first two games.
Alastair Cook believes his sides problems are partly psychological, and certainly with only 1 win from their last 15 One Day Internationals in India, England may have a mental hurdle to overcome, but more worrying for Cooks’ side is that the balance of the team doesn’t look right and their tactics seem to be just scratched in the sand, changing from game to game.
England have lost wickets regularly in both innings in this series so far, and that is of particular concern. One has to question why for example, after his captain was out for a duck having won the toss and choosing to bat first, Craig Kieswetter elected to prod at a wide ball that did very little, giving his wicket away without troubling the scorers himself in Delhi?
Surely England’s batsmen know that if you lose a wicket, it’s best to be disciplined and consolidate for a period, rather than carrying on and losing further wickets in quick succession?
England’s bowlers are not completely absolved from blame here either. Apart from Bresnan, who has been the pick of the bowlers in both games, the rest have struggled.
England have played 3 quick bowlers in both matches but with no pace in the pitches or movement off the seam of through the dry Indian air, 30 pretty tame overs have been sent down which, once the new balls have worn soft, give the Indian batsmen time to set themselves before using the pace of the ball to earn easy runs. As bowlers tire, so the more expansive shots become easier.
England should have learnt all this from the World Cup here earlier this year. During that competition, the teams that fared best took pace off the ball almost all of the way through the innings to make it harder to score runs. Its fundamental stuff on the sub-continent.
England have Scott Borthwick in their squad, a young and talented leg-spinner from Durham, why not give him a go? Dropping a seamer for a second spinner may not rest that easily with England, but they have to adapt to the conditions and playing three seamers in a One Day International in India into opponents hands.
Cook mentioned a mental block that England need to overcome to triumph in India, but perhaps the issue is more deep-rooted than that. 40 overs-a-side cricket matches are played on the county circuit in England as opposed to 50 over matches at International level and perhaps that 10 over disparity has an effect on England players, to the extent they rush and panic when batting and try and force the issue when bowling?
It’s a theory, but by playing these One-Day-specific tours regularly going forward as the ECB plans to, England players will surely learn how to pace an innings better, when to push and when to consolidate, not to mention how to bowl to the conditions available to them; it still astounds me how few yorkers English bowlers bowl at the death when opposition attacks send down seemingly little else during the final few overs for instance.
There are fundamental flaws in the way England approach One Day cricket away from the comforts of home, particularly on the sub-continent, and these will take time to resolve. They might not win this series, in fact they might be on the end of a bit of a hiding from India, but if they can begin to develop a more savvy approach to One Day cricket, it won’t have been a wasted trip after-all.
Tom Huelin for DieHard Cricket Fans
Follow Tom on Twitter @tomhue1

Tuesday, October 18, 2011

Payback Series: Game 2 – Thoughts

The payback continues with interest. This time at the Ferozshah Kotla in Delhi.
  • Again England did not pick Bell. Why is a mystery. Just hope that Bopara’s military medium isn’t the factor keeping him in the team ahead of Bell.
  • An even bigger mystery is what is an underperforming Kieswetter doing in the team? They have Bairstow and Jos Butler is the reserves. In fact Butler is considered the better keeper by Somerset followers as well. Some re-juggling is certainly required.
  • Good pace generated by Umesh Yadav. Maybe a bit wayward but the pace is there. As of NOW.
  • And for a change India bowled well within time. Though I hardly see it getting mentioned anywhere.
  • Gambhir should be opening. Can’t have makeshift openers like Parthiv Patel with Gambhir in the line-up.
  • Good innings by Kohli. Nothing surprising from him in that. In fact, the partnership with Gambhir had a deja vu feeling written all over it.
  • Indian conditions and the English seam bowling looks neutralized. On the basis of 2 games only. Still early days here.
  • Victory by 8 wickets with about 80 balls to spare. One word. Comprehensive.
Let the payback continue.
Nishant Kumar for DieHard Cricket Fans
Follow Nishant on Twitter @NishantSKumar

Friday, October 14, 2011

Payback Series: Game 1 – Thoughts

It was time for revenge and payback, proclaimed our TV channels promoting the current India – England series in India. But 5 ODIs and a T20 do not give enough opportunity to give payback for the happenings over the summer in England. Yet it was nice to start with a win in the 1st ODI in Hyderabad. I could only watch the England innings. Followed the Indian innings via online text commentary at work. Here are my thoughts for the match.
  • Why did England not play the “Sledgehammer of Eternal Justice”? Cook as captain and having to fit in Trott, KP, Bopara, Bell in one lineup. Thats an interesting conundrum. Still feel that Bell should have been the first one to be picked in this lot.
  • No debut for Varun Aaron as yet. When will I get to see a school alumnus play for India. (Aside – his Facebook fan page is here)
  • On paper, the bowling looked weaker than in England except the conditions had been reversed. This game showed how big the difference can be. (I know it is only one game. Still)
  • Do English batsman in general have a difficulty against left arm spin? Ravindra Jadeja’s success here and the successful county stints enjoyed by Pragyan Ojha this season & Murali Kartik over the years certainly does point to that conclusion.
  • Random Factoid – Almost 3 years since India beat England in an international match in any format. Last victory was in the Chennai Test, 2008 post the 26/11 incidents
  • In summary, England’s opening performance in India reminded of India’s performance in England.
  • 126 runs – a comprehensive win
Nishant Kumar for DieHard Cricket Fans
Follow Nishant on Twitter @NishantSKumar

Tuesday, October 11, 2011

India vs England Series Preview – And The Point Is ?

Critics have said that the series between India and England starting in Hyderabad on Friday 14th October is little more than a money spinning extravaganza, taking advantage of Indian fans love of limited overs cricket with a meaningless procession of five One Day Internationals and a T20 during a 3 week tour that has been shoe-horned into an already hectic international schedule.
Indeed this tour isn’t even an obligatory one. The ICC demands that every major cricketing nation plays each other home and away over a nine year period, something known as the Future Tours Programme and England touring India is certainly not a series in danger of defaulting on that promise any time soon.
For me though, this tour is a great idea. Never mind the financial implications; this One Day series pits current World Champions India against an England side hoping to claim their crown at the next World Cup in New Zealand and Australia in 2015.
Since winning the Ashes in January, the first time England have triumphed Down Under in 24 years, Andy Flower has put success in One Day cricket at the top of England’s agenda. However after a disappointing showing at the World Cup in April 2011, losing by 10 wickets to Sri Lanka in the quarter finals, changes were needed and Alastair Cook has since replaced Andrew Strauss as captain in this format.
With home series wins over Sri Lanka and India already secured under Cooks captaincy the future looks bright for this young side, but this tour of India will be their toughest assignment yet and we will learn a lot about just how far England have come by the end of it.
Historically England have struggled in India, winning only one of their last 13 One Day Internationals here, so any success enjoyed in this series will be a real statement of intent from Cook’s men.
But regardless of how this series progresses, it’s just nice to see England and the ECB focussing their efforts on 50 over cricket, rather than annexing a One Day International series awkwardly to the end of long test schedule, as if it were a warm-down exercise to the main event.
Look at the Ashes schedule last year. Many people, including Sir Ian Botham, bemoaned the decision to play 7 ODI’s at the end of such a draining and intense test series. Those One Day Internationals were supposed to be a warm-up for England’s World Cup campaign but with players tired and unmotivated, poor performances and injuries were all England took home from that series.
Whether One Day cricket is your thing or not is up to you, but one thing’s for sure: for England to prosper in this format it is imperative that they play more series like this one, focussing specifically on the 50 over game, building a specialist squad to compete with the best teams around.
This series should tell us a lot about whether England’s masterplan for world domination in every form of cricket is on course, but it is unlikely to be one-way traffic. Given India’s strength at home, plus England’s appalling record there, even a narrow defeat may give rise to optimism in the camp, depending on how well the side performs.
My only concern is that in continuing the rotation policy that sees Jimmy Anderson rested for this series, will we actually see an England One Day side that is essentially the first XI regularly enough before the World Cup in 2015?
In Australia last year, Alastair Cook shined the ball for the whole of the test series. Why? Because out of all the England players, he sweated the least (sweat on the ball reduced the chances of getting the ball to reverse swing).
To be the best, that level of detail needs to be considered, and I just hope that England remember to hone a winning first XI as well as amassing a huge pool of players from which to choose from.
Or perhaps I’m just being pedantic now?
Tom Huelin for DieHard Cricket Fans
Follow Tom on Twitter @tomhue1